From: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pgw99@doc.ic.ac.uk
Subject: Re: PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:20:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030729172035.D6570@borg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307291915.h6TJF6YB000421@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>; from john@grabjohn.com on Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:15:06PM +0100
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:15:06PM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
> Does anybody have any suggestions for recommended standard uses for
> parallel port connected LEDs?
I think someone else mentioned notification of e-mail. Well, I get
too much e-mail for that (I am on the kernel list, after all) but that
suggestion make me think of a soft of "Check Engine" light.
In my Red Hat box there are various sanity checks that happen
regularly and they send me an e-mail when one of those items goes
wrong. For example, if a raid disk dies or a partition gets too full
(what are others?), I get an e-mail. It might be nice to have those
programs also light an LED.
-kb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-29 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-29 19:15 PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever John Bradford
2003-07-29 19:51 ` Tim Hockin
2003-07-29 20:09 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-07-29 21:20 ` Kent Borg [this message]
2003-07-29 21:44 ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-30 21:44 ` Mike Jagdis
2003-07-30 12:15 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-30 18:50 John Bradford
2003-07-30 16:08 John Bradford
2003-07-30 17:44 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 18:50 ` Marc Giger
2003-07-30 19:05 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-30 22:22 ` Brian McGroarty
2003-07-30 18:56 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-30 19:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 19:06 ` Marc Giger
2003-07-30 19:16 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-31 8:31 ` jw schultz
2003-07-30 15:50 John Bradford
2003-07-30 12:27 "Andrey Borzenkov"
2003-07-29 20:38 John Bradford
2003-07-29 20:37 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-29 21:34 ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-29 20:40 ` Randolph Bentson
2003-07-29 21:15 ` Ryan Flowers
2003-07-29 20:43 ` Eli Carter
2003-07-30 6:09 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-30 6:37 ` Helge Deller
2003-07-29 15:17 Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-29 18:00 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 11:45 ` Jamey Hicks
2003-07-30 12:27 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 6:36 ` CaT
2003-07-30 13:00 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-30 13:20 ` CaT
2003-07-30 23:28 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030729172035.D6570@borg.org \
--to=kentborg@borg.org \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pgw99@doc.ic.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox