From: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:31:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030731083139.GN14240@pegasys.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307301608.h6UG8YQJ000339@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:08:34PM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
> I'll buy some LEDs and build a parallel port connected LED panel
> tomorrow... Do you think the overhead of driving the LEDs would have
> too much of a negative effect on system performance? If so, or if we
> want more flexibility, maybe we could work out a design for a PCI
> card, which could include more than 12 LEDs - 7-segment numeric
> displays of pid, etc.
If you are going to talk special hardware i'd suggest making
it a USB device instead of a PCI card.
Most systems manufactured in the last five years or so ago
have USB but laptops don't and many servers don't have a
spare PCI slot. There is enough power specified by the
standard to make it a passive device in most cases. If you
want you could use a cable long enough to mount the display
on the wall outside the wiring closet or server room.
Sounds fun so have some.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: jw@pegasys.ws
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-31 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-30 16:08 PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever John Bradford
2003-07-30 17:44 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 18:50 ` Marc Giger
2003-07-30 19:05 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-30 22:22 ` Brian McGroarty
2003-07-30 18:56 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-30 19:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 19:06 ` Marc Giger
2003-07-30 19:16 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-31 8:31 ` jw schultz [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-30 18:50 John Bradford
2003-07-30 15:50 John Bradford
2003-07-30 12:27 "Andrey Borzenkov"
2003-07-29 20:38 John Bradford
2003-07-29 20:37 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-29 21:34 ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-29 20:40 ` Randolph Bentson
2003-07-29 21:15 ` Ryan Flowers
2003-07-29 20:43 ` Eli Carter
2003-07-30 6:09 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-30 6:37 ` Helge Deller
2003-07-29 19:15 John Bradford
2003-07-29 19:51 ` Tim Hockin
2003-07-29 20:09 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-07-29 21:20 ` Kent Borg
2003-07-29 21:44 ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-30 21:44 ` Mike Jagdis
2003-07-30 12:15 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-29 15:17 Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-29 18:00 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 11:45 ` Jamey Hicks
2003-07-30 12:27 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 6:36 ` CaT
2003-07-30 13:00 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-30 13:20 ` CaT
2003-07-30 23:28 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030731083139.GN14240@pegasys.ws \
--to=jw@pegasys.ws \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox