public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:31:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030731083139.GN14240@pegasys.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307301608.h6UG8YQJ000339@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:08:34PM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
> I'll buy some LEDs and build a parallel port connected LED panel
> tomorrow...  Do you think the overhead of driving the LEDs would have
> too much of a negative effect on system performance?  If so, or if we
> want more flexibility, maybe we could work out a design for a PCI
> card, which could include more than 12 LEDs - 7-segment numeric
> displays of pid, etc.

If you are going to talk special hardware i'd suggest making
it a USB device instead of a PCI card.

Most systems manufactured in the last five years or so ago
have USB but laptops don't and many servers don't have a
spare PCI slot.  There is enough power specified by the
standard to make it a passive device in most cases.  If you
want you could use a cable long enough to mount the display
on the wall outside the wiring closet or server room.

Sounds fun so have some.

-- 
________________________________________________________________
	J.W. Schultz            Pegasystems Technologies
	email address:		jw@pegasys.ws

		Remember Cernan and Schmitt

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-31  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-30 16:08 PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever John Bradford
2003-07-30 17:44 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 18:50   ` Marc Giger
2003-07-30 19:05     ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-30 22:22     ` Brian McGroarty
2003-07-30 18:56   ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-30 19:02     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 19:06     ` Marc Giger
2003-07-30 19:16       ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-31  8:31 ` jw schultz [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-30 18:50 John Bradford
2003-07-30 15:50 John Bradford
2003-07-30 12:27 "Andrey Borzenkov" 
2003-07-29 20:38 John Bradford
2003-07-29 20:37 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-29 21:34   ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-29 20:40 ` Randolph Bentson
2003-07-29 21:15   ` Ryan Flowers
2003-07-29 20:43 ` Eli Carter
2003-07-30  6:09   ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-30  6:37   ` Helge Deller
2003-07-29 19:15 John Bradford
2003-07-29 19:51 ` Tim Hockin
2003-07-29 20:09 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-07-29 21:20 ` Kent Borg
2003-07-29 21:44   ` Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-30 21:44     ` Mike Jagdis
2003-07-30 12:15 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-29 15:17 Philip Graham Willoughby
2003-07-29 18:00 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30 11:45   ` Jamey Hicks
2003-07-30 12:27     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-30  6:36 ` CaT
2003-07-30 13:00   ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-30 13:20     ` CaT
2003-07-30 23:28 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030731083139.GN14240@pegasys.ws \
    --to=jw@pegasys.ws \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox