From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272501AbTGaPX5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:23:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272524AbTGaPX4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:23:56 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:10451 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272538AbTGaPWa (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:22:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:22:21 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Jeff Garzik Cc: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" , "Marcelo Tosatti (E-mail)" , "Lkml (E-mail)" Subject: Re: cciss updates for 2.4.22 Message-ID: <20030731152221.GE22104@suse.de> References: <3F292478.6040504@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F292478.6040504@pobox.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 31 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote: > >The attached tarball contains 2 patches. The first is an author change for > >the cciss driver. The second resolves an issue when sharing IRQs with > >another controller. The patches have been built & tested against > >2.4.22-pre9. They can be installed in any order. > >More to come. > > > Mike, you should consider sending one-patch-per-email. This makes it > much easier for Marcelo to use standard scripts to quickly and easily > apply your patches. Agree on that, a tar'ed collection of patches is hard to easily review. Mike, try attaching them next time. I know your mailer eats inlines, but attachments ought to work fine. -- Jens Axboe