public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: David Miller <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist 
	<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6] iptables AH/ESP fix (3/3)
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 15:01:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030802130138.GH6894@naboo> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1947 bytes --]

Hi Davem!

The below patch (by Patrick McHardy) fixes the iptables 'esp' match to
use the same structure definition like the 2.5/2.6 in-kernel IPsec
implementation.

Please apply, thanks.

# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
#	           ChangeSet	1.1537  -> 1.1538 
#	net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_esp.c	1.6     -> 1.7    
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/07/21	kaber@trash.net	1.1538
# [NETFILTER]: Use common struct ip_esp_hdr declaration
# --------------------------------------------
#
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_esp.c	Thu May 22 01:35:36 2003
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_esp.c	Mon Jul 21 02:46:04 2003
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 /* Kernel module to match ESP parameters. */
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
+#include <linux/ip.h>
 
 #include <linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_esp.h>
 #include <linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h>
@@ -13,10 +14,6 @@
 #define duprintf(format, args...)
 #endif
 
-struct esphdr {
-	__u32   spi;
-};
-
 /* Returns 1 if the spi is matched by the range, 0 otherwise */
 static inline int
 spi_match(u_int32_t min, u_int32_t max, u_int32_t spi, int invert)
@@ -37,7 +34,7 @@
       int offset,
       int *hotdrop)
 {
-	struct esphdr esp;
+	struct ip_esp_hdr esp;
 	const struct ipt_esp *espinfo = matchinfo;
 
 	/* Must not be a fragment. */
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2003-08-02 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030802130138.GH6894@naboo \
    --to=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox