Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21

William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-05T05:15:21Z

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:04:22AM +0200, Martin Konold wrote:
> when using 2.6.0.test1 on a high end laptop (P-IV 2.2 GHz, 1GB RAM) I notice
> very significant slowdown in interactive usage compared to 2.4.21.
> The difference is most easily seen when switching folders in kmail. While
> 2.4.21 is instantaneous 2.6.0.test1 shows the clock for about 2-3 seconds.
> I am using maildir folders on reiserfs.
> Can anyone verify this behaviour?
> What other information do you need?

CPU profiles, e.g.
readprofile -n -m /boot/System.map-`uname -r` | sort -rn -k 1,1 | head -25

Also logs of vmstat 1.

-- wli