From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275273AbTHGKL6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:11:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275282AbTHGKL6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:11:58 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:45514 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275273AbTHGKKC (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:10:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:09:57 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Pavel Machek Cc: cb-lkml@fish.zetnet.co.uk, kernel list Subject: Re: Disk priority dependend on nice level... Message-ID: <20030807100957.GI858@suse.de> References: <20030806232810.GA1623@elf.ucw.cz> <20030806234036.GA209@elf.ucw.cz> <20030807080251.GY7982@suse.de> <20030807100419.GC166@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030807100419.GC166@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 07 2003, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > I ported `subj` to 2.6.0-test2. I do not yet have idea if it works, > > > > but it compiles ;-). > > > > > > It compiles, it event boots, but it does not seem to have much effect > > > :-(. > > > > Now that the queue reference counting is in the current bk tree, we are > > that much closer to real modular io schedulers. I'll post the cfq with > > priorities for that. > > I'm looking forward to that. (If you have some patch I could test, > mail it my way). What I have is still some kernel revisions old, plus it's using the modular io scheduler interface. So I cannot easily post anything, you will have to wait until after my vacation I'm afraid. -- Jens Axboe