* Re: NULL. Again.
@ 2003-08-10 1:21 Chip Salzenberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Chip Salzenberg @ 2003-08-10 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sneakums; +Cc: Linux Kernel
According to Sean Neakums:
>According to Chip Salzenberg:
>>According to Jamie Lokier:
>>> printf ("%p", NULL);
>>> printf ("%p", 0);
>>
>> Please, *please*, _no_one_else_ argue about NULL/zero/false
>> etc. until after reading this:
>>
>> ===[[ http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/s5.html ]]===
>
> I had thought that the need for writing NULL [...]
Jeepers, Sean! Why the frell are you subjecting the list to
speculation, when the facts are right there in a URL that you
amazingly enough *quoted* in your speculation-laden message?
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@pobox.com>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-08-10 1:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-10 1:21 NULL. Again Chip Salzenberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox