From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272455AbTHNQFr (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:05:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272468AbTHNQFr (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:05:47 -0400 Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.6]:64690 "EHLO hirsch.in-berlin.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272455AbTHNQFl (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:05:41 -0400 X-Envelope-From: kraxel@bytesex.org Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:06:31 +0200 From: Gerd Knorr To: Dennis =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rklund?= Cc: Flameeyes , Pavel Machek , Christoph Bartelmus , LIRC list , LKML , vojtech@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] lirc for 2.5/2.6 kernels - 20030802 Message-ID: <20030814160630.GA14967@bytesex.org> References: <20030811163913.GA16568@bytesex.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 05:22:27PM +0200, Dennis Björklund wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > Would this allow you to have one reciever and different remote controles > (used for different programs in the end)? If the two remote controls send different codes it should be possible to map them to different "keys" and disturgish them that way. Gerd -- sigfault