From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275415AbTHNRqR (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:46:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275424AbTHNRqR (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:46:17 -0400 Received: from pD9FFB9E0.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.255.185.224]:5275 "EHLO oscar.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275415AbTHNRqO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:46:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:45:57 +0200 From: Patrick Mau To: Linux Kernel Subject: [OT] BitKeeper and 2.6 release Message-ID: <20030814174553.GA1422@oscar.ping.de> Reply-To: Patrick Mau Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I just wanted to ask two question about the upcoming(?) 2.6.0 release and BitKeeper. Just because I'm curious ... 1) Will 2.6.0 be a completly new import of an exported 2.5.XX release ? 2) Will 2.6.0 be _excactly_ identical to 2.5.XX ? With no additional changesets ? Thanks, Patrick PS: I know it's (nearly) OT