Re: [PATCH] RFC: kills consistent_dma_mask

Krzysztof Halasa
2003-09-01T18:27:15Z

"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> writes:

> Umm, come on, this is inaccurate.

I tried to make it accurate. I might be missing something, though.
What exactly do you think is inaccurate?

> But this is unrelated to
> the consistent DMA issues.

Hmm... What do you mean?

BTW: consistent_dma_mask and dma_mask names are misleading: they are
(in theory) related to allocation vs mapping requests mainly -
the consistent vs non-consistent thing is secondary.
--
Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH