From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
green@namesys.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, akpm@osdl.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mason@suse.com
Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:58:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030818205825.GF10320@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030818221921.7b96de86.skraw@ithnet.com>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:19:21PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:06:25 +0200
> Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > an SMP kernel puts the double of the stress on the mem bus, so it might
> > still be ram that went bad around the time you upgraded from 2.4.19. Or
> > it maybe simply a buggy smp motherboard, or whatever.
> >
> > Of course I can't be sure but we can't exclude it.
>
> It is unlikely for bad ram to survive memtest for several hours.
How many hours?
Are you using memtest 3.0 that supports larger ammounts of memory, and has
specific tests for ECC (ie disabling it)?
Are you doing a full run with all tests, and not just the standard tests?
(you should let it complete one, or preferably two or three in this mode)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-18 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030808002918.723abb08.skraw@ithnet.com>
2003-08-08 14:54 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-08 15:05 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-08 15:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-10 21:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-10 23:23 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-11 9:33 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 20:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-13 10:55 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 14:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-13 14:59 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 15:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 15:30 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 16:04 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 16:34 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 22:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-14 8:45 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-14 17:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-14 17:42 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 2:08 ` Chris Mason
2003-08-15 9:40 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 10:28 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 12:55 ` Chris Mason
2003-08-20 14:21 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (yet another oops for rc2) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-05 9:24 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (case closed) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-05 13:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-15 10:13 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 10:31 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-18 15:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-18 20:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-08-18 22:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-19 1:12 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 7:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-19 13:10 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-19 14:18 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-19 18:00 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 21:58 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-19 13:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-13 15:21 ` Jim Gifford
2003-08-13 17:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-10 14:23 ` Keith Owens
2003-08-02 12:27 2.4.22-pre lockups (decoded oops for pre8) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 16:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-06 7:41 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06 8:58 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-06 9:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-06 9:36 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06 12:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-18 14:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-06 18:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-07 2:14 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-07 5:35 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-07 12:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] ` <3F325198.2010301@namesys.com>
2003-08-07 13:32 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 20:29 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-18 20:39 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 21:09 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-07 15:52 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030818205825.GF10320@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=green@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox