Re: 2.6 - sysfs sensor nameing inconsistency

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 08:49:57PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Saturday 16 August 2003 20:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > I like this idea, but now that the name logic has changed in the i2c
> > > > code, care to re-do this patch?  Just set the name field instead of
> > > > creating a new file in sysfs.
> > >
> > > something like attached patch? I like it as well :)
> >
> > Why rename local variables?  Your patch would be a lot smaller if you
> > just keep the same local name variable, and fix up the name strings.
> >
> 
> To make it clear for anyone porting other drivers that we are using type_name 
> and not client_name or whatever. In 2.4 every driver have both; mixing name, 
> type_name and client_name will just add to confusion.

No, we don't need both a "type_name" and a "client_name" anymore, right?
So it's just a simple "name" for the i2c client device.  "type_name" is
handled by the name of the client driver now.

> I will redo patch if you insist but I really prefer having things consistent 
> if possible.

I prefer having things make sense :)
So yes, I'd prefer if you change your patch.

I've cced the sensors mailing list to get any feedback from them.

thanks,

greg k-h