From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275362AbTHSG3o (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:29:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275365AbTHSG3o (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:29:44 -0400 Received: from nessie.weebeastie.net ([61.8.7.205]:46317 "EHLO nessie.weebeastie.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275362AbTHSG3l (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:29:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:30:51 +1000 From: CaT To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/10] 2.6.0-t3: struct C99 initialiser conversion Message-ID: <20030819063050.GA17577@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: Furball Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hmmm... looks like 130k is too big for lk so I'll resend all split up. ----- Forwarded message from CaT ----- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:10:55 +1000 From: CaT To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sf.net Subject: [PATCH] 2.6.0-t3: struct C99 initialiser conversion Organisation: Furball Inc. Ok. I think I did it. I used grep+sed at first and then went through the resulting patches, fixing any problems by hand until I could spot no more. It was a lot of fun weeding out the mistakenly changed bit-definitions but I think I got them all. I also compiled the kernel with make allyesconfig, checking into compile failure for anything I broke. Obviously though, the more people that check this the better. Also, while I finally decided on a single patch, I can split if need be. It's 100k and not that hard to go through, esp with syntax highlighting (I should know... I went through it several times :) Anyhow... here goes... ----- End forwarded message ----- -- "How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the other day," he said. - http://tinyurl.com/h6fo