From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: andrea@suse.de, green@namesys.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mason@suse.com
Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10)
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:12:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030819091243.007acac0.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030819011208.GK10320@matchmail.com>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:12:08 -0700
Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> wrote:
> > > It is unlikely for bad ram to survive memtest for several hours.
> >
> > memtest is single threaded, UP kernel works fine too.
>
> Are you saying that one CPU can't saturate the memory bus? Or maybe we're
> hitting something on the CPU bus, or just that SMP will change the timings
> and stress things differently? Or that if memtest doesn't test from the
> second CPU then it could be a faulty cpu/L2?
Well, if memtest does not use a second available CPU then probably we should
ask the author about this...
> Grr, has anything been done to verify the hardware is running withing specs
> and isn't too hot?
In fact we are talking about datacenter environment with air conditioning and
the like.
Besides the favourite test box I have others (already mentioned in this thread)
- SMP with completely different hw - where I can make 2.4.21 and above crash,
too.
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-19 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030808002918.723abb08.skraw@ithnet.com>
2003-08-08 14:54 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-08 15:05 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-08 15:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-10 21:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-10 23:23 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-11 9:33 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 20:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-13 10:55 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 14:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-13 14:59 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 15:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 15:30 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 16:04 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 16:34 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 22:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-14 8:45 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-14 17:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-14 17:42 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 2:08 ` Chris Mason
2003-08-15 9:40 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 10:28 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 12:55 ` Chris Mason
2003-08-20 14:21 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (yet another oops for rc2) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-05 9:24 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (case closed) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-05 13:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-15 10:13 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 10:31 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-18 15:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-18 20:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-18 22:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-19 1:12 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 7:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-08-19 13:10 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-19 14:18 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-19 18:00 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 21:58 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-19 13:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-13 15:21 ` Jim Gifford
2003-08-13 17:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-10 14:23 ` Keith Owens
2003-08-02 12:27 2.4.22-pre lockups (decoded oops for pre8) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 16:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-06 7:41 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06 8:58 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-06 9:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-06 9:36 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06 12:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-18 14:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-06 18:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-07 2:14 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-07 5:35 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-07 12:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] ` <3F325198.2010301@namesys.com>
2003-08-07 13:32 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 20:29 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-18 20:39 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 21:09 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-07 15:52 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030819091243.007acac0.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=green@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox