From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@sympatico.ca>,
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:48:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030820004851.GD4306@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308191731230.22008-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 05:32:04PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> while thinking about scaling based on CPU speed remember systems with
> variable CPU clocks (or even just variable performance like the transmeta
> CPU's)
This and/or mixed cpu speeds could make load balancing interesting on
SMP. I wonder who's tried. jejb?
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-20 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-19 2:54 scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 3:06 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 4:07 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 5:23 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 6:54 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 19:18 ` bill davidsen
2003-08-19 23:48 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 23:54 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 19:01 ` bill davidsen
2003-08-20 0:15 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-20 0:32 ` David Lang
2003-08-20 0:48 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-08-20 4:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-20 4:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-20 13:59 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-20 16:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-20 2:52 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 19:02 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 17:51 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-20 2:41 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-20 18:45 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 4:13 ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-19 4:23 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 4:29 ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-19 5:06 ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 6:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030820004851.GD4306@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=ericstl34@sympatico.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox