From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263327AbTHVP10 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:27:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263554AbTHVP10 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:27:26 -0400 Received: from havoc.gtf.org ([63.247.75.124]:60332 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263327AbTHVP1V (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:27:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:27:20 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Ingo Oeser Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] noapic should depend on ioapic config not local Message-ID: <20030822152720.GA31693@gtf.org> References: <20030821052140.GA19039@gtf.org> <20030822110920.B639@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030822110920.B639@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:09:20AM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:21:40AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Zwane's comment was correct, it needs to be CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC. > > Does this also apply to 2.4.22-rc2? > > I must use noapic on my system and 2.4.22 does ignore it, while > 2.4.21 doesn't. Marcelo just pulled a bunch of ACPI fixes, so I would check the latest BK, or wait for tonight's BK snapshot. So, yes, it does apply to 2.4.22-rc2, but the Intel guys may have taken care of it already. Jeff