From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263167AbTHVNoa (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:44:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263180AbTHVNoa (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:44:30 -0400 Received: from c210-49-248-224.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:61648 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263167AbTHVNo0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:44:26 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Wiktor Wodecki Subject: Re: [PATCH]O18int Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:51:16 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: linux kernel mailing list References: <200308222231.25059.kernel@kolivas.org> <20030822134136.GA711@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20030822134136.GA711@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308222351.16691.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 22 August 2003 23:41, Wiktor Wodecki wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:31:20PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > Content-Description: clearsigned data > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Here is a small patchlet. > > > > It is possible tasks were getting more sleep_avg credit on requeuing than > > they could burn off while running so I've removed the on runqueue bonus > > to requeuing task. > > > > Note this applies onto O16.3 or 2.6.0-test3-mm3 as O17 was dropped. > > > > This patch is also available here along with a patch against 2.6.0-test3: > > http://kernel.kolivas.org/2.5 > > > > Con > > this patch still makes my xmms skip on light io load (untar kernel > source, open lkml mailbox folder) while opening mozilla. Even after > mozilla is there xmms is still skipping. Processes take ages to spawn. > And no, I'm not in swap. A 'su -'is taking 10 seconds to procceed. > Same applies when rm -Rf'ing a kernel tree. > Here is some more data for the curious: > note the load of 11. I can even get it to 30 while doing 3 tar xf > bla.tar simultanously. Complete mystery. > > I'm going to fetch some fish in the next two weeks in poland, so I will > not be able to do any more testing from sunday on. Happy coding (while I > stick to O10 *g*) Thanks for comments. ] There it is again; the reference to darn O10. Hrm. One question before your holiday; your O10 kernel is it the same kernel tree or a different/newere one? I'm looking to blame something else here I know but I need to know; this just doesn't hold with any testing here. Con