From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Wiktor Wodecki <wodecki@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]O18int
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:54:36 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308230154.36357.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030822154639.GA711@gmx.de>
On Saturday 23 August 2003 01:46, Wiktor Wodecki wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 01:03:19AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > There it is again; the reference to darn O10. Hrm. One question
> > > > before your holiday; your O10 kernel is it the same kernel tree or a
> > > > different/newere one? I'm looking to blame something else here I know
> > > > but I need to know; this just doesn't hold with any testing here.
> > >
> > > well, I run O10 on top of test2, since I didn't need any patches from
> > > test3 I didn't rediff it.
> >
> > So O18 is also on test2?
>
> Okay, I applied O18 on top of test2 now. Xmms works as a charm,
> programm start is still slow while doing an tar xf linuxtest2.tar.
> Already open xterm's (one with mutt) react a bit in-interactive (I spawn
> vi to write this email and a :w takes 5 seconds). It is nonetheless
> worse than O10, sorry to say that.
Ok, but none of that weird starvation and massive load and skipping audio.
Interesting. At least it's clear now that all is _not_ just my patches.
Thanks for testing.
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-22 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-22 12:31 [PATCH]O18int Con Kolivas
2003-08-22 13:41 ` [PATCH]O18int Wiktor Wodecki
2003-08-22 13:51 ` [PATCH]O18int Con Kolivas
2003-08-22 14:56 ` [PATCH]O18int Wiktor Wodecki
[not found] ` <200308230103.19724.kernel@kolivas.org>
2003-08-22 15:46 ` [PATCH]O18int Wiktor Wodecki
2003-08-22 15:54 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-08-22 17:53 ` [PATCH]O18int Mike Fedyk
[not found] ` <200308222335.50318.insecure@mail.od.ua>
2003-08-22 20:44 ` [PATCH]O18int Wiktor Wodecki
2003-08-22 21:04 ` [PATCH]O18int Mike Fedyk
2003-08-22 22:40 ` [PATCH]O18int Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-08-27 23:02 ` [PATCH]O18int Wes Janzen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308230154.36357.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wodecki@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox