public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	torvalds@osdl.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you?
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:16:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030825181621.G16790@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308250840360.1157-100000@cherise>; from mochel@osdl.org on Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:47:16AM -0700

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:47:16AM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> That's fine. I will fix PCMCIA, as I have devices to test with. I have no 
> ARM devices (nor do I want any). I can take a stab, but won't guarantee 
> anything. Could you tell me, though, when/if these devices did work with 
> what power management scheme? APM? 

I omitted to say that I've fixed up most of the non-platform based
PCMCIA socket drivers.  However, this set of patches is waiting on
a response from gregkh/jgarzik on a fix to the PCI save/restore state
handling.

In any case, we need to get the platform device situation resolved by
public discussion before making any code changes.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-25 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-22 21:08 [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 21:25 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 21:53   ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:05     ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-23  1:03       ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-08-23 16:22       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-25 19:05         ` [PM] powering down special devices Patrick Mochel
2003-08-25 19:53           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-25  9:52       ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:10   ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:13     ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 22:17       ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 22:36   ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-23 10:47   ` Russell King
2003-08-24 11:54     ` Russell King
2003-08-26 15:39       ` [PM] Config Options Patrick Mochel
2003-08-24 12:08     ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Russell King
2003-08-25 15:47     ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-25 16:27       ` Russell King
2003-08-25 16:57         ` Matt Porter
2003-08-25 17:14           ` Russell King
2003-08-25 17:34             ` Matt Porter
2003-08-28 15:38         ` Platform Devices Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 12:02         ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 17:41           ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-09 20:19             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-09 20:24               ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-09 21:43               ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-09 22:54                 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 23:07                   ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-09 23:07                     ` [PM] Passing suspend level down to drivers Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 23:23                       ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-10  0:06                         ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-10  6:12                       ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-09-10 11:48                         ` Alan Cox
2003-09-09 23:15                     ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Alan Cox
2003-09-09 22:56               ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-25 17:16       ` Russell King [this message]
2003-08-22 22:04 ` Timothy Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030825181621.G16790@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mochel@osdl.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox