public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: Nagendra Singh Tomar <nagendra_tomar@adaptec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tasklet_kill will always hang for recursive tasklets on a UP
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 04:38:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030826043802.D1212@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308260010480.31955-100000@localhost.localdomain>; from nagendra_tomar@adaptec.com on Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:15:58AM +0530

Nagendra Singh Tomar wrote:
> I fail to understand this. How can we say that its not a bug. If we 
> support recursive tasklets, we should support killing them also. If we can 
> do it why not do it. Is there any reason for that.

It's just a question of how you define "to kill" :-) But the
naming is ambiguous, because people may indeed expect
tasklet_kill to work like kill(2).

Obviously, tasklet_kill could set a flag that prevents a
tasklet from rescheduling itself. But then you'd change
the semantics of tasklet_schedule, and in many cases, you'd
still need some flag to tell you what has happened.

Example: if a tasklet allocates some resources, and frees
them when running the next time, you'd need a flag that
tells the caller(s) of tasklet_kill whether there are
still such resources that need freeing.

The current mechanism makes sure that the tasklet will
execute one last time, if scheduled before tasklet_kill.

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-26  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-25  0:00 tasklet_kill will always hang for recursive tasklets on a UP Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-25  1:53 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-25 14:11 ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-25 17:14   ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-27 18:21     ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-27 17:46       ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-28 15:29         ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-28 15:53           ` kuznet
2003-08-28 16:17             ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-29  2:22               ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-26  5:48 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-25 18:45   ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-26  7:38     ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2003-08-26  8:32       ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-26 17:56         ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-27  1:47           ` kuznet
2003-08-26 16:17             ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-28 13:17               ` kuznet
2003-08-28 16:25                 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-09-04 13:25                   ` kuznet
2003-08-29  2:30             ` Werner Almesberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030826043802.D1212@almesberger.net \
    --to=wa@almesberger.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nagendra_tomar@adaptec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox