From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: Nagendra Singh Tomar <nagendra_tomar@adaptec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tasklet_kill will always hang for recursive tasklets on a UP
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 04:38:02 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030826043802.D1212@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308260010480.31955-100000@localhost.localdomain>; from nagendra_tomar@adaptec.com on Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:15:58AM +0530
Nagendra Singh Tomar wrote:
> I fail to understand this. How can we say that its not a bug. If we
> support recursive tasklets, we should support killing them also. If we can
> do it why not do it. Is there any reason for that.
It's just a question of how you define "to kill" :-) But the
naming is ambiguous, because people may indeed expect
tasklet_kill to work like kill(2).
Obviously, tasklet_kill could set a flag that prevents a
tasklet from rescheduling itself. But then you'd change
the semantics of tasklet_schedule, and in many cases, you'd
still need some flag to tell you what has happened.
Example: if a tasklet allocates some resources, and frees
them when running the next time, you'd need a flag that
tells the caller(s) of tasklet_kill whether there are
still such resources that need freeing.
The current mechanism makes sure that the tasklet will
execute one last time, if scheduled before tasklet_kill.
- Werner
--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-26 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-25 0:00 tasklet_kill will always hang for recursive tasklets on a UP Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-25 1:53 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-25 14:11 ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-25 17:14 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-27 18:21 ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-27 17:46 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-28 15:29 ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-28 15:53 ` kuznet
2003-08-28 16:17 ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-29 2:22 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-26 5:48 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-25 18:45 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-26 7:38 ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2003-08-26 8:32 ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-26 17:56 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-27 1:47 ` kuznet
2003-08-26 16:17 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-28 13:17 ` kuznet
2003-08-28 16:25 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-09-04 13:25 ` kuznet
2003-08-29 2:30 ` Werner Almesberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030826043802.D1212@almesberger.net \
--to=wa@almesberger.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagendra_tomar@adaptec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox