From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263230AbTH0IW7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2003 04:22:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263244AbTH0IW7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2003 04:22:59 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:30980 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263230AbTH0IW5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2003 04:22:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:22:54 +0100 From: Russell King To: Marcus Hall Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-arm-2.5.59 problem connecting from win 98 Message-ID: <20030827092254.A22441@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Marcus Hall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3F4BD073.6020105@coraccess.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3F4BD073.6020105@coraccess.com>; from mhall@coraccess.com on Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:26:11PM -0600 X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Microsoft Outlook is vulnerable to viruses. See www.mutt.org for more details. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:26:11PM -0600, Marcus Hall wrote: > Things work just fine with http/ftp/telnet from a linux box, but if I > try to connect from a win 98 system, linux panics (don't really blame > it..) with the error message 'kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:323', > which appears to say that an skbuff is being freed while still on a > list. Please supply the full backtrace - it may be a driver doing something it shouldn't. > I don't believe that there are any changes in the core networking in > the arm/xscale patches applied to the base 2.5.59 kernel, just some > tweaking of the smc9194 and cs89x0 modules. It seems unlikely that this > problem would exist in the "official" kernel for long, but it also seems > unlikely to be particular to the arm either... Is it a known bug > (hopefully with a patch somewhere)? The best I can advise is to upgrade to something more recent (eg, a 2.6.0-test kernel.) -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html