public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Nick Urbanik <nicku@vtc.edu.hk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble??
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:14:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030829211440.GB3150@codepoet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062167896.27561.4.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Fri Aug 29, 2003 at 03:38:17PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2003-08-29 at 15:00, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> > Is there _anyone_ who is using a number of ATA133 IDE disks (>=6), each on
> > its own IDE channel, on a number of PCI IDE cards, and doing so
> 
> The most I know of is 8, and that was one of the people who found the
> shared IRQ/IDE race cases that 2.4.21 or so fixed.

I have a ton of drives plugged into some promise IDE cards and my
motherboard's builtin ICH5 that I use for testing things.

I have not been seeing IRQ problems.  However, when I have both
the promise and the intel IDE drivers built into the kernel,
there _is_ some sortof a race condition present, such that
stat("/", &statbuf) returns the wrong value for statbuf.st_rdev
about 50% of the time when booting.  Instead of returning the
major/minor with the correct values (/dev/hda2 on the ICH5), it
instead returns some value from one of the drives on the promise
card such as /dev/hdh or some such.  I've tried tracking that
down, but havn't been able to squash it thus far.  Grrrr.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-29 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-29  0:49 Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble?? Nick Urbanik
2003-08-29  9:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-29 14:00   ` Nick Urbanik
2003-08-29 14:22     ` lk
2003-08-29 14:38     ` Alan Cox
2003-08-29 21:14       ` Erik Andersen [this message]
2003-08-30  3:46       ` Nick Urbanik
2003-09-08  6:13         ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-08 17:20           ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-08-29 15:13     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-31 12:43     ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2003-08-31 15:46       ` joe briggs
2003-08-31 23:41       ` Nick Urbanik
2003-09-01  6:01         ` many IDE PCI cards "spurious 8259a" irq15(SMBus nforce2) Resident Boxholder
2003-09-01  7:51           ` Alan Cox
2003-09-01 10:14             ` IDE PCI cards IOAPIC " Resident Boxholder
2003-09-06 12:44 ` Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble?? Steve Bromwich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-22 16:36 Alex Finch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030829211440.GB3150@codepoet.org \
    --to=andersen@codepoet.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicku@vtc.edu.hk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox