public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Unnecessary objects built in 2.6.0-test4?
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:31:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309010231.39329.rob@landley.net> (raw)

I'm running 2.6.0-test4 on my laptop, and it's quite nice.  (Haven't beaten 
also into submission yet, and it won't suspend, and kde is dropping some 
events, but everything else is chugging along quite nicely...)

But the kernel is huge, an I'm curious why.  So I did this in the build 
directory:

find . -name "*.o" | xargs ls -l | less

And the results are interesting.

For example: I have a coppermine celeron in this laptop, and I told the build 
that, and I did NOT select generic x86 optimizations, so why did it build 
objects with names like amd, centaur, and cyrix, winchip, k7...?

-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         3348 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/amd.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        55962 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/built-in.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2572 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/centaur.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7908 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         5664 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         4820 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7957 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/built-in.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2212 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/k7.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2184 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2952 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1600 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p5.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2312 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p6.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1264 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/winchip.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1452 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/amd.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        23991 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/built-in.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         3084 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/centaur.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         3776 Sep  1 01:24 
./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cyrix.o

Rob

             reply	other threads:[~2003-09-01  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-01  6:31 Rob Landley [this message]
2003-09-01 21:04 ` Unnecessary objects built in 2.6.0-test4? Mike Fedyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200309010231.39329.rob@landley.net \
    --to=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox