From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:33:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030901093344.GC155@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030901092646.B15370@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hi!
> > Its the only way to have power managment working by 2.6.1.
>
> Rubbish. PM is now working here on ARM again - within a week of Pat's
> change.
As you said, you are not using kernel/power.
> > Lots of
> > work went into pm during 2.5 series, and Patrick invalidated all that
> > with one, 140KB, untested and broken patch (and he managed to break
> > about all rules about patch submission).
>
> I agree that it needed public review _before_ hitting Linus' tree - a
> change of that magnitude with only half the subsystems fixed up should
> not go directly into Linus' tree without review.
Good. [I believe it was big enough to require testing on separate tree
(-mm? -ac?) before going mainline].
> > It is not possible to fix damage he done within week.
>
> It is my understanding that the old PM in 2.5 was not suitable for
> the PPC architecture and the new PM model is. As far as the drivers
> are concerned, the interface presented is a definite improvement on
> what there was before (there are a few things which I'd like to see
> further improvement on, but that's not a subject for discussion in
> this thread.)
I only see dm getting more and more complicated :-(.
> I don't particularly care about kernel/power/* because its not useful
> for me - whereas you obviously do. Maybe that's where your axe is
> grinding. But whatever, don't throw the baby (driver model changes)
> out with the bath water.
kernel/power/* changes are worst, because that's subsystem I should be
maintainer of. Driver model changes are quite bad, too, because they
mean we should go over all drivers and fix them. And driver failures
are often pretty subtle.
> And finally, there's longer than a week to fix it. 8)
I'm not looking forward to another half-a-year before kernel gets into
state where it was in -test3.
I still want that crap killed, at least because of the way *how* it
was merged. Altrough killing kernel/power/* would be good start, and
maybe it would lead us to a state where dm changes can be debugged.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-01 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-31 23:28 Fix up power managment in 2.6 Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 6:57 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 8:26 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 9:33 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2003-09-01 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-01 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 21:52 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:30 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:48 ` Russell King
2003-09-02 17:17 ` Greg KH
2003-09-03 15:13 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 10:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 13:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 13:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 17:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 23:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 0:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 16:11 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 16:21 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 23:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 17:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 17:59 ` bill davidsen
2003-09-03 23:20 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 20:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-03 22:14 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-04 4:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-04 14:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 10:29 ` Jan Rychter
2003-09-05 5:58 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 10:56 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 11:51 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 12:01 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 17:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 18:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 21:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:57 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 19:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:09 ` Keyboard stuff (was Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6) Rob Landley
2003-09-05 20:31 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:01 ` Fix up power managment in 2.6 Richard A Nelson
2003-09-05 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:49 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-05 20:13 Nicolas Mailhot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030901093344.GC155@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox