From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 13:58:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030901205834.GC31760@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309011627.28052.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:27:28PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> contest benchmarks.
>
> no_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
Regressions:
> cacherun:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 1 75 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.94
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 1 77 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
> process_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 108 69.4 64.0 28.7 1.35
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 125 59.2 92.5 38.4 1.58
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 131 56.5 104.5 41.2 1.64
> io_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 4 119 64.7 43.4 19.2 1.49
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 4 110 70.0 35.4 16.4 1.39
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 4 129 59.7 43.1 16.9 1.61
Improvements:
> ctar_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 3 117 67.5 1.0 5.1 1.46
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 115 69.6 1.0 6.1 1.46
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 3 99 80.8 0.0 0.0 1.24
> xtar_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 3 132 58.3 3.0 7.5 1.65
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 141 54.6 3.3 7.0 1.78
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 3 109 70.6 1.0 3.7 1.36
> io_other:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 116 67.2 48.0 21.4 1.45
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 110 70.0 41.0 18.8 1.39
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 111 69.4 40.8 18.8 1.39
> read_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 109 72.5 8.6 5.5 1.36
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 106 73.6 8.3 5.6 1.34
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 100 78.0 6.5 5.0 1.25
> list_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 97 79.4 0.0 8.2 1.21
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.22
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 95 80.0 0.0 7.4 1.19
> mem_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 101 78.2 67.0 3.0 1.26
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 98 79.6 66.5 3.1 1.24
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 93 84.9 65.0 3.2 1.16
> dbench_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 4 390 19.5 6.2 57.3 4.88
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 242 31.8 3.0 44.2 3.06
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 4 260 29.6 3.2 45.0 3.25
Except that mm2 is doing better with dbench...
What changed there?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-01 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-01 6:27 [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest Con Kolivas
2003-09-01 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030901205834.GC31760@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox