* [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest
@ 2003-09-01 6:27 Con Kolivas
2003-09-01 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2003-09-01 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux kernel mailing list; +Cc: Andrew Morton
contest benchmarks.
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.6.0-test4-mm2 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.6.0-test4-mm4 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 1 75 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.94
2.6.0-test4-mm2 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.6.0-test4-mm4 1 77 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 2 108 69.4 64.0 28.7 1.35
2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 125 59.2 92.5 38.4 1.58
2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 131 56.5 104.5 41.2 1.64
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 3 117 67.5 1.0 5.1 1.46
2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 115 69.6 1.0 6.1 1.46
2.6.0-test4-mm4 3 99 80.8 0.0 0.0 1.24
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 3 132 58.3 3.0 7.5 1.65
2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 141 54.6 3.3 7.0 1.78
2.6.0-test4-mm4 3 109 70.6 1.0 3.7 1.36
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 4 119 64.7 43.4 19.2 1.49
2.6.0-test4-mm2 4 110 70.0 35.4 16.4 1.39
2.6.0-test4-mm4 4 129 59.7 43.1 16.9 1.61
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 2 116 67.2 48.0 21.4 1.45
2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 110 70.0 41.0 18.8 1.39
2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 111 69.4 40.8 18.8 1.39
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 2 109 72.5 8.6 5.5 1.36
2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 106 73.6 8.3 5.6 1.34
2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 100 78.0 6.5 5.0 1.25
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 2 97 79.4 0.0 8.2 1.21
2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.22
2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 95 80.0 0.0 7.4 1.19
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 2 101 78.2 67.0 3.0 1.26
2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 98 79.6 66.5 3.1 1.24
2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 93 84.9 65.0 3.2 1.16
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test4 4 390 19.5 6.2 57.3 4.88
2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 242 31.8 3.0 44.2 3.06
2.6.0-test4-mm4 4 260 29.6 3.2 45.0 3.25
Some i/o effects and some memory balance effects.
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest
2003-09-01 6:27 [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest Con Kolivas
@ 2003-09-01 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2003-09-01 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: linux kernel mailing list, Andrew Morton
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:27:28PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> contest benchmarks.
>
> no_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
Regressions:
> cacherun:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 1 75 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.94
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 1 77 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
> process_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 108 69.4 64.0 28.7 1.35
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 125 59.2 92.5 38.4 1.58
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 131 56.5 104.5 41.2 1.64
> io_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 4 119 64.7 43.4 19.2 1.49
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 4 110 70.0 35.4 16.4 1.39
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 4 129 59.7 43.1 16.9 1.61
Improvements:
> ctar_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 3 117 67.5 1.0 5.1 1.46
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 115 69.6 1.0 6.1 1.46
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 3 99 80.8 0.0 0.0 1.24
> xtar_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 3 132 58.3 3.0 7.5 1.65
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 141 54.6 3.3 7.0 1.78
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 3 109 70.6 1.0 3.7 1.36
> io_other:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 116 67.2 48.0 21.4 1.45
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 110 70.0 41.0 18.8 1.39
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 111 69.4 40.8 18.8 1.39
> read_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 109 72.5 8.6 5.5 1.36
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 106 73.6 8.3 5.6 1.34
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 100 78.0 6.5 5.0 1.25
> list_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 97 79.4 0.0 8.2 1.21
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.22
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 95 80.0 0.0 7.4 1.19
> mem_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 101 78.2 67.0 3.0 1.26
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 98 79.6 66.5 3.1 1.24
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 93 84.9 65.0 3.2 1.16
> dbench_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 4 390 19.5 6.2 57.3 4.88
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 242 31.8 3.0 44.2 3.06
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 4 260 29.6 3.2 45.0 3.25
Except that mm2 is doing better with dbench...
What changed there?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-01 20:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-01 6:27 [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest Con Kolivas
2003-09-01 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox