From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 00:19:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030901221920.GE342@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030901225243.D22682@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hi!
> > He just thinks he can fix his code, and I want that code to be
> > reverted, reviewed, tested, and than merged back. There's no way
> > current mess can be fixed in reasonable time.
>
> Please don't - that means undoing all the work I've put in to make
> ARM work again, and I don't have time to play silly games like this.
Okay, so Patrick broke ARM and you fixed it. But he also broke i386 and
x86-64; and it is not at all clear that his "newer" version is better
than the old one. [Really, what's the advantage? AFAICS it is more
complicated and less flexible, putting "suspend" method to bus as
oppossed to device].
I guess I could survive dm changes going in, but breaking both driver
model, sleep support and all the drivers at same time is a bit too
much...
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-01 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-31 23:28 Fix up power managment in 2.6 Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 6:57 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 8:26 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-01 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 21:52 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:19 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2003-09-01 22:30 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:48 ` Russell King
2003-09-02 17:17 ` Greg KH
2003-09-03 15:13 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 10:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 13:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 13:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 17:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 23:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 0:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 16:11 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 16:21 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 23:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 17:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 17:59 ` bill davidsen
2003-09-03 23:20 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 20:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-03 22:14 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-04 4:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-04 14:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 10:29 ` Jan Rychter
2003-09-05 5:58 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 10:56 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 11:51 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 12:01 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 17:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 18:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 21:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:57 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 19:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:09 ` Keyboard stuff (was Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6) Rob Landley
2003-09-05 20:31 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:01 ` Fix up power managment in 2.6 Richard A Nelson
2003-09-05 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:49 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-05 20:13 Nicolas Mailhot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030901221920.GE342@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox