From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: precise characterization of ext3 atomicity
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:12:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030904191255.GE13676@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F578656.60005@namesys.com>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:37:10PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:25:18PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In data=journal and data=ordered modes ext3 also guarantees that the
> >>metadata will be committed atomically with the data they point to.
> >>However ext3 does not provide user data atomicity guarantees beyond the
> >>scope of a single filesystem disk block (usually 4 kilobytes). If a
> >>single write() spans two disk blocks it is possible that a crash partway
> >>through the write will result in only one of those blocks appearing in
> >>the file after recovery.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >And how does reiser4 do this without changing the userspace apps?
> >
> We don't. We just make the hovercraft, we don't force you to go over
> the water.....
So by default with no user space modifications, reiser4 will be atomic for
each write() call, and ext3 will if it aligns withing a single page.
Is that correct?
Then you can go on to specify that you can have larger transactions if you
make some changes to the userspace apps.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-04 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-04 14:20 precise characterization of ext3 atomicity Hans Reiser
2003-09-04 15:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-04 15:59 ` Hans Reiser
2003-09-04 16:12 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-04 16:25 ` Hans Reiser
2003-09-04 18:15 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-04 16:05 ` Antonio Vargas
2003-09-04 18:37 ` Hans Reiser
2003-09-04 19:12 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-09-04 21:03 ` Hans Reiser
2003-09-04 19:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-09-04 21:32 ` Hans Reiser
2003-09-04 22:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-09-05 13:47 ` Chris Mason
2003-09-09 13:09 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 19:21 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-09-09 19:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-04 20:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-09-04 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-04 21:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-09-04 21:39 ` Hans Reiser
2003-09-04 21:59 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030904191255.GE13676@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox