From: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: swsusp: revert to 2.6.0-test3 state
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:09:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309050852.26430.mhf@linuxmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030904193105.GF27650@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Friday 05 September 2003 03:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
> It puts you in a better position, AFAICS. When code is rewritten
> anyway, "don't fix it if it aint broken" is not so important any
> more -- good for you.
>
> I still hope to avoid two software suspends in 2.6.X.
>
Bah, there may be three implementations now.
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 06:55, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> In all actuality, I don't need swsusp. I have a better suspend-to-disk
> implementation that is faster, smaller, and cleaner. I've hesitated
> merging it because I thought swsusp improvements would be more welcome.
> Obviously they're not; or you haven't actually taken the time to read the
> code.
>
This looks like a democratic (darwinistic) approach which will help to get
the best solution for 2.6.
Regards
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-03 19:04 swsusp: revert to 2.6.0-test3 state Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 23:34 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-04 11:58 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-04 15:25 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-04 18:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-04 19:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-04 21:44 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-09-09 15:34 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-09-10 21:50 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-04 19:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-09-04 19:31 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 1:09 ` Michael Frank [this message]
2003-09-05 4:13 ` brian
2003-09-05 5:53 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 10:32 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200309050852.26430.mhf@linuxmail.org \
--to=mhf@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox