public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0test4 bk1 and
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:54:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030905085419.6ea00d78.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309051559.18910.arekm@pld-linux.org>

Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org> (by way of Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org>) wrote:
>
> On Monday 25 of August 2003 15:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday I've changed kernel from test3 to test4 with bk1 patch applied
> > and such error appeared (and it's showning all the time):
> >
> > bad: scheduling while atomic!
> > Call Trace:
> >  [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x60
> >  [<c011ccd0>] schedule+0x3b0/0x3c0
> >  [<cf8c1257>] acpi_processor_idle+0xe9/0x1e5 [processor]
> >  [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x60
> >  [<c01090eb>] cpu_idle+0x3b/0x40
> >  [<c0328734>] start_kernel+0x184/0x1b0
> >  [<c0328480>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x100
> 
> Nothing about this has changed in test4bk3 nor test4bk6. Still yells about
> ,,scheduling while atomic''.
> 
> No one has idea what's happening here? Some change between test3 and test4
>  did this.

Grab the latest snapshot from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/testing/cset/ (the very first
link) and see if it's still happening.

If so then please add the `initcall_debug' option to the kernel boot command line and see if any messages such as 

	error in initcall at 0xNNNNNNNN: returned with preemption imbalance

come out.  If they do, look up 0xNNNNNNNN in System.map.

If none of this sheds any light, please send your full .config.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-05 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-05 13:59 2.6.0test4 bk1 and Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2003-09-05 15:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-09-07 19:11   ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2003-09-07 19:29     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-25 13:35 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030905085419.6ea00d78.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arekm@pld-linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox