From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0test4 bk1 and
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:54:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030905085419.6ea00d78.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309051559.18910.arekm@pld-linux.org>
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org> (by way of Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org>) wrote:
>
> On Monday 25 of August 2003 15:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday I've changed kernel from test3 to test4 with bk1 patch applied
> > and such error appeared (and it's showning all the time):
> >
> > bad: scheduling while atomic!
> > Call Trace:
> > [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x60
> > [<c011ccd0>] schedule+0x3b0/0x3c0
> > [<cf8c1257>] acpi_processor_idle+0xe9/0x1e5 [processor]
> > [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x60
> > [<c01090eb>] cpu_idle+0x3b/0x40
> > [<c0328734>] start_kernel+0x184/0x1b0
> > [<c0328480>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x100
>
> Nothing about this has changed in test4bk3 nor test4bk6. Still yells about
> ,,scheduling while atomic''.
>
> No one has idea what's happening here? Some change between test3 and test4
> did this.
Grab the latest snapshot from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/testing/cset/ (the very first
link) and see if it's still happening.
If so then please add the `initcall_debug' option to the kernel boot command line and see if any messages such as
error in initcall at 0xNNNNNNNN: returned with preemption imbalance
come out. If they do, look up 0xNNNNNNNN in System.map.
If none of this sheds any light, please send your full .config.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-05 13:59 2.6.0test4 bk1 and Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2003-09-05 15:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-09-07 19:11 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2003-09-07 19:29 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-25 13:35 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030905085419.6ea00d78.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arekm@pld-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox