From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:33:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030905093328.GA200@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0309031618390.944-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Hi!
> > Notice that this is done during resume. You are free to suspend with 1
> > cpu, then attempt to resume with 2 cpus. Not *too* likely to happen,
> > but....
>
> That's a silly thing to do, though I don't support the notion of letting
> people find out the hard way. Why not just fail on CONFIG_SMP until it's
> done right?
I guess runtime check for number of cpus is better idea -- with more
P4's around kernels with CONFING_SMP will be very common. We should at
least work in single-processor config there.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-31 23:28 Fix up power managment in 2.6 Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 6:57 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 8:26 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-01 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 21:52 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:30 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:48 ` Russell King
2003-09-02 17:17 ` Greg KH
2003-09-03 15:13 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 10:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 13:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 13:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 17:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 23:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 0:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 16:11 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 16:21 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 23:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 17:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 17:59 ` bill davidsen
2003-09-03 23:20 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 9:33 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2003-09-03 20:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-03 22:14 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-04 4:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-04 14:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 10:29 ` Jan Rychter
2003-09-05 5:58 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 10:56 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 11:51 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 12:01 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 17:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 18:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 21:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:57 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 19:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:09 ` Keyboard stuff (was Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6) Rob Landley
2003-09-05 20:31 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:01 ` Fix up power managment in 2.6 Richard A Nelson
2003-09-05 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:49 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-05 20:13 Nicolas Mailhot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030905093328.GA200@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox