From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262425AbTIEK47 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:56:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262436AbTIEK47 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:56:59 -0400 Received: from auth22.inet.co.th ([203.150.14.104]:18704 "EHLO auth22.inet.co.th") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262425AbTIEK46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:56:58 -0400 From: Michael Frank To: Pavel Machek , Rob Landley Subject: Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 18:56:05 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Patrick Mochel , kernel list , Nigel Cunningham , swsusp-devel References: <200309050158.36447.rob@landley.net> <20030905102628.GB16859@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20030905102628.GB16859@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> X-OS: KDE 3 on GNU/Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309051856.05873.mhf@linuxmail.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 05 September 2003 18:26, Pavel Machek wrote: > 2.6 swsusp development is not really done on that list. Oh Really - do I have to dig out the message in which you agreed to consolidate the effort on that list? Reminds me of when Nigel wrote to Linus for guidance on the development direction of swsusp and you replied... You have been so nice recently, actually, I am just beginning to wonder on who's payroll your are... Michael