From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261596AbTIGMmq (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:42:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261982AbTIGMmq (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:42:46 -0400 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:51973 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261596AbTIGMmp (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:42:45 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 14:42:37 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , robert@schwebel.de Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection Message-ID: <20030907124237.GA922@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , robert@schwebel.de References: <20030907112813.GQ14436@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030907112813.GQ14436@fs.tum.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:28:13PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Could you change this: > +ifdef CONFIG_CPU_386 > + CFLAGS_CPU := -march=i386 > +endif > + > > -CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) > +CFLAGS += $(CFLAGS_CPU) to: cpuflags-$(CONFIG_CPU_386) := -march=i386 CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) $(cpuflags-y) I kept cflags-y, but you may have totally eliminated that? Sam