From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Daum <peter_daum@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [2.4 patch] fix CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 22:39:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030907213924.GA28927@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73u17ojq83.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> writes:
>
> > With CONFIG_M686 CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT was set to 5, but a Pentium 4
> > requires 7.
> It doesn't require 7, it just prefers 7.
*nod*. This 'fix' also papers over the bug instead of fixing it.
Likely it's something like a network card driver setting its cacheline
size incorrectly. Peter what NIC did you see the problem on ?
I thought Ivan's PCI cacheline sizing fixes from 2.6
(see arch/i386/pci/common.c) already made it into 2.4,
but from a quick grep, it seems that didn't happen.
> > The patch below does:
> > - set CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 7 for all Intel processors (needed for
> > the Pentium 4)
> > - set CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 6 for the K6 (needed for the Athlon)
> I think these changes should be only done with CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is set.
> Otherwise the people who want kernels really optimized for their CPUs
> won't get the full benefit. On UP it does not make that much difference,
> but on a SMP kernel having a bigger than needed cache size wastes a lot
> of memory.
ACK.
Dave
--
Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-07 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030907195557.GK14436@fs.tum.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-07 20:30 ` [2.4 patch] fix CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT Andi Kleen
2003-09-07 21:39 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-09-08 8:15 ` Peter Daum
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.30.0309072228110.9987-100000@swamp.bayern.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-07 21:57 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-07 20:36 Manfred Spraul
2003-09-08 14:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-08 17:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-08 17:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-08 19:45 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-09-09 14:49 ` Peter Daum
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-07 19:55 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 20:59 ` Peter Daum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030907213924.GA28927@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br \
--cc=peter_daum@t-online.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox