public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] add kobject to struct module
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:10:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030911024252.C69A12C0C7@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:04:29 MST." <20030911000429.GF1461@matchmail.com>

In message <20030911000429.GF1461@matchmail.com> you write:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:45:38PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > To quote from include/linux/moduleparam.h:
> > /* This is the fundamental function for registering boot/module
> >    parameters.  perm sets the visibility in driverfs: 000 means it's
> >    not there, read bits mean it's readable, write bits mean it's
> >    writable. */
> 
> Any chance to make it always visible and read-only by default with the
> option of making it writable?

Nope.  The author specifies exactly what they want, no default.  It's
just safer this way: see RMK's concerns about what would happen if we
did it to unsuspecting module authors... 

See include/linux/moduleparam.h, especially the module_param() macro.

> Any chance the parameter defaults (if they're not hard coded...) could be
> exposed even if they're not given to the module on the command line?  (wish
> list...)

They should be there.  It would be nice to have some way of telling
which ones were modified, so that a userspace util could save just
those ones on shutdown, for example.  I can't think of an obvious way
of doing this though (mtime > epoch maybe?).

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-11  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-09 22:24 [RFC] add kobject to struct module Greg KH
2003-09-10  0:13 ` Greg KH
2003-09-10  3:31 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-10  4:11   ` Greg KH
2003-09-10  8:07     ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-10 15:26       ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-11  1:13         ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-11  6:26           ` Greg KH
2003-09-11  8:18             ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-11 17:15               ` Greg KH
2004-02-24 23:29           ` Greg KH
2004-03-05 14:34             ` Rusty Russell
2004-05-07 21:28               ` Greg KH
2003-09-10 23:06       ` Greg KH
2003-09-11  2:33         ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-10 23:32 ` Russell King
2003-09-10 23:45   ` Greg KH
2003-09-11  0:04     ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-11  0:21       ` Greg KH
2003-09-11  2:10       ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-09-11  2:04   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030911024252.C69A12C0C7@lists.samba.org \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox