From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261603AbTIKWFa (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:05:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261606AbTIKWFa (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:05:30 -0400 Received: from zok.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.101]:24466 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261603AbTIKWFZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:05:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:04:34 -0700 To: Andrew de Quincey Cc: andrew.grover@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] deal with lack of acpi prt entries gracefully Message-ID: <20030911220434.GA28095@sgi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew de Quincey , andrew.grover@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030909201310.GB6949@sgi.com> <200309112213.13263.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> <20030911212059.GA27063@sgi.com> <200309112300.30882.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309112300.30882.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:00:30PM +0100, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > None of the above. We have our own NUMAlink based interrupt protocol > > model. > > Oooer! Hmm, the existing code would probably NOT like having _PRT entries for > a model it doesn't know about.... you could add support for it fairly easily > though I suppose... Yeah, that's what Andy suggested too. I guess I have to use one of the reserved fields and try to get the ACPI spec updated. Thanks, Jesse