Re: Nick's scheduler policy v15

Cliff White
2003-09-11T23:29:40Z

> Hi,
> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v15/
>
> This was going to get high res timers, but instead fixed a bug that might
> be causing a few people oopses. Also very small interactivity tweaks.
>
> I'm starting to work on SMP and NUMA ideas now, so if any interactivity
> things are bothering you, please tell me soon. I should be getting access
> to a 32-way NUMA soon, so I'm sort of holding off chaning too much until
> then.
>
> Enjoy.
>
Are these against 2.6.0-test5-mm1? We're not getting a clean apply over here.
cliffw

sched-nopolicy:
---------------------
patching file kernel/fork.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 912.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/fork.c.rej
patching file kernel/sched.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 186 (offset 38 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 241 (offset 37 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 663 (offset 117 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 847 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1013 (offset 117 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 912 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1047 (offset 117 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 986 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 1114 (offset 117 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 1029 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #13 FAILED at 1056.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 1230 (offset 135 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 1146 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #16 FAILED at 1189.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 1343 (offset 136 lines).
Hunk #18 succeeded at 1233 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #19 FAILED at 1249.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 2380 with fuzz 2 (offset -112 lines).
Hunk #21 FAILED at 2395.
Hunk #22 FAILED at 2445.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 3010 (offset 351 lines).
5 out of 23 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/sched.c.rej
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>