* 2.4.22-ck2
@ 2003-09-13 12:10 Con Kolivas
2003-09-13 12:13 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Marc-Christian Petersen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2003-09-13 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux kernel mailing list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here is an update to my patchset:
http://kernel.kolivas.org
Includes:
O(1) Scheduler
Batch scheduling
Preemptible
Low Latency
O1int interactivity
AA VM addons
Read Latency2
Variable HZ
Supermount-NG
Bootsplash
XFS
GRSec
Desktop tuning
Split out patches available on the website; incrementals available on request
(my bandwidth / storage is limited sorry).
Changes:
The O1int interactivity backport is more substantial now bringing it in line
with O20.1int with only the nanosecond resolution missing from the 2.6 work.
CK vm hacks and swap prefetch were dropped and AA Vm addons were merged as
part of the default - lack of time prevented me maintaining ck vm properly.
XFS Merged - thanks Rik
GRSec Merged - thanks Rik
The slow termination of applications is fixed by the completion of the
interactivity backport to this version.
Feel free to send me comments, queries, suggestions, patches and bug reports.
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Ywk9ZUg7+tp6mRURAioHAJ46qHL8zO8Vg/lmXTlk99+WCGD1YwCfU/Gg
SurHyuGKhGhgF2R5t7sWPtI=
=/p/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.22-ck2
2003-09-13 12:10 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
@ 2003-09-13 12:13 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-09-13 12:22 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marc-Christian Petersen @ 2003-09-13 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux kernel mailing list; +Cc: Con Kolivas
On Saturday 13 September 2003 14:10, Con Kolivas wrote:
Hi Con,
> The O1int interactivity backport is more substantial now bringing it in
> line with O20.1int with only the nanosecond resolution missing from the 2.6
and where is that split out patch?
ciao, Marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.22-ck2
2003-09-13 12:13 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Marc-Christian Petersen
@ 2003-09-13 12:22 ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-14 21:43 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Herbert Poetzl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2003-09-13 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc-Christian Petersen, linux kernel mailing list
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:13, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Saturday 13 September 2003 14:10, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> Hi Con,
>
> > The O1int interactivity backport is more substantial now bringing it in
> > line with O20.1int with only the nanosecond resolution missing from the
> > 2.6
>
> and where is that split out patch?
As I said; available by request. Will mail it to you separately
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.22-ck2
2003-09-13 12:22 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
@ 2003-09-14 21:43 ` Herbert Poetzl
2003-09-14 21:53 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Poetzl @ 2003-09-14 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: linux kernel mailing list
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:22:31PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:13, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > On Saturday 13 September 2003 14:10, Con Kolivas wrote:
> >
> > Hi Con,
> >
> > > The O1int interactivity backport is more substantial now bringing it in
> > > line with O20.1int with only the nanosecond resolution missing from the
> > > 2.6
> >
> > and where is that split out patch?
>
> As I said; available by request. Will mail it to you separately
please send it to me too ... /AOL
TIA,
Herbert
> Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.22-ck2
2003-09-14 21:43 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Herbert Poetzl
@ 2003-09-14 21:53 ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-14 22:19 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Herbert Poetzl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2003-09-14 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Poetzl; +Cc: linux kernel mailing list
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:43, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:22:31PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:13, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > > On Saturday 13 September 2003 14:10, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Con,
> > >
> > > > The O1int interactivity backport is more substantial now bringing it
> > > > in line with O20.1int with only the nanosecond resolution missing
> > > > from the 2.6
> > >
> > > and where is that split out patch?
> >
> > As I said; available by request. Will mail it to you separately
>
> please send it to me too ... /AOL
A more substantial set of incrementals is now available via my website thanks
to Wiktor Wodecki who is kindly hosting my stuff now.
http://kernel.kolivas.org
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.22-ck2
2003-09-14 21:53 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
@ 2003-09-14 22:19 ` Herbert Poetzl
2003-09-15 0:24 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Poetzl @ 2003-09-14 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: linux kernel mailing list
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:41AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> A more substantial set of incrementals is now available via my website thanks
> to Wiktor Wodecki who is kindly hosting my stuff now.
>
> http://kernel.kolivas.org
great!
Is there a chance to get the lowlat & preempt without
the O(1) scheduler? I know this sounds like a weird?
request but it would be very useful ...
TIA,
Herbert
> Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.22-ck2
2003-09-14 22:19 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Herbert Poetzl
@ 2003-09-15 0:24 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2003-09-15 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Poetzl; +Cc: linux kernel mailing list
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:19, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:41AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > A more substantial set of incrementals is now available via my website
> > thanks to Wiktor Wodecki who is kindly hosting my stuff now.
> >
> > http://kernel.kolivas.org
>
> great!
>
> Is there a chance to get the lowlat & preempt without
> the O(1) scheduler? I know this sounds like a weird?
> request but it would be very useful ...
Check the links on my page. These have been available for ages. My patch is
simply a difficult merge of all of them.
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-15 0:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-13 12:10 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
2003-09-13 12:13 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-09-13 12:22 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
2003-09-14 21:43 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Herbert Poetzl
2003-09-14 21:53 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
2003-09-14 22:19 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Herbert Poetzl
2003-09-15 0:24 ` 2.4.22-ck2 Con Kolivas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox