public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [BENCHMARK] reaim 2x,4x,8x with various SMP balancing patches
@ 2003-09-14  9:44 Con Kolivas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2003-09-14  9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux kernel mailing list; +Cc: Andrew Morton

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

With the help of the OSDL hardware I've thrown a bootload of reaim benchmarks 
at these various patches because of the confusion regarding their usefulness. 
2.6.0-test5 is the baseline, and the 3 unique patches CMT,A3,BT were added by 
themselves and all together to 2.6.0-test5 for comparison. Finally the full 
2.6.0-test5-mm1 patch was compared. The A3 patch was modified slightly to 
overcome the one minor magnitude error for fairness. Looking at the url for 
each benchmark and examining the "Graph - Jobs per minute" is useful to 
assess where the performance hovers. 


Legend

260t5 - vanilla 2.6.0-test5
CMT - sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch
A3 - sched-2.6.0-test2-mm2-A3.patch
BT - sched-balance-tuning.patch
all - CMT + A3 + BT
mm1 - 2.6.0-test5-mm1


2 CPU:

Kernel	Throughput	URL
260t5	1337.11		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279474/
CMT	1321.92		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279796/
A3	1304.82		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279799
BT	1326.27		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279802
All	1337.79		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279805/
mm1	1316.95		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279588/


4 CPU:

Kernel	Throughput	URL
260t5	5406.68		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279883
CMT
A3	5099.14		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279800
BT	5721.79		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279803
All	4919.36		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279806
mm1	5360.32		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279887


8 CPU:

Kernel	Throughput	URL
260t5	8812.21		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279448/
CMT	8794.14		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279798
A3	7084.15		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279801
BT	8615.13		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279804
All	7629.14		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279919
mm1	8478.10		http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279562/


4xCMT seemed to not successfully finish.

In summary, it appears that all the patches cause detriment to performance, 
except the combination of BT with 4 cpus. The A3 patch is particularly 
detrimental, but it is reassuring to see that the extra patches in mm1 (which 
includes O1int patches) recover a lot of that performance, even with the 
other balancing patches.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ZDhtZUg7+tp6mRURAmJAAJ4zMYHg7iSuVHi7SpiS5hkmoaQl9wCggrcB
SSH6dbJthgABVnEIn4K/z3M=
=Jz7G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-09-14  9:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-14  9:44 [BENCHMARK] reaim 2x,4x,8x with various SMP balancing patches Con Kolivas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox