public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br>
Cc: neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: experiences beyond 4 GB RAM with 2.4.22
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:21:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030916102113.0f00d7e9.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309151847160.2914-100000@logos.cnet>

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:01:42 -0300 (BRT)
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br> wrote:

> > I already thought about that and tried. In fact it is as fast and fine as 2
> > GB setup. It runs really smooth. 
> > The really simple test for the problem is running "updatedb" (find over the
> > whole filesystem). The box comes to a crawl while this is running, network
> > is absolutely bad, interactivity is rather dead, very often not even a ssh
> > login works.
> 
> Does -pre4 (with the VM changes from Andrea) show any difference? There 
> are significant changes in the per-zone decisions which might help.

Hello Marcelo,

it looks like -pre4 performs not well even in 4 GB environment. After few days
of running I find hanging 2.4.22 nfs-clients on a 2.4.23-pre4 server. 

On the client I get a bunch of those:

Sep 16 03:02:00 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK
Sep 16 03:02:32 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 not responding, still
trying
Sep 16 03:02:32 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK
Sep 16 03:02:37 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 not responding, still
trying
Sep 16 03:02:37 brenda last message repeated 3 times
Sep 16 03:02:37 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK 
Sep 16 03:02:37 brenda last message repeated 3 times
Sep 16 03:02:38 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 not responding, still
trying
Sep 16 03:02:38 brenda last message repeated 6 times
Sep 16 03:02:38 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK 
Sep 16 03:02:38 brenda last message repeated 6 times
Sep 16 03:02:41 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 not responding, still
trying
Sep 16 03:02:41 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK
Sep 16 03:02:41 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 not responding, still
trying
Sep 16 03:02:41 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK
Sep 16 03:02:42 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 not responding, still
trying
Sep 16 03:02:42 brenda last message repeated 2 times
Sep 16 03:02:42 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK 
Sep 16 03:02:42 brenda last message repeated 2 times
Sep 16 03:02:43 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 not responding, still
trying
Sep 16 03:02:43 brenda last message repeated 8 times
Sep 16 03:02:43 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK 
Sep 16 03:03:08 brenda last message repeated 7 times
Sep 16 03:03:09 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 not responding, still
trying
Sep 16 03:03:09 brenda last message repeated 2 times
Sep 16 03:03:09 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK 
Sep 16 03:03:10 brenda last message repeated 2 times

And then the nfs-action is dead. Process hangs. This has not happened with
2.4.22 as a server. It showed up after a day of creating 4,7 GB dvd iso images.
Creating theses isos was ok, no error or so during the action.
Is it possible that pre4 does not recover all that well from former memory
pressure?
 
> Have you tried 2.4.22-aa?

Sorry, not yet.
I will go back to 2.4.22 and stress it to see if these effects show up.


Regards,
Stephan

  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-16  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-09  9:01 experiences beyond 4 GB RAM with 2.4.22 Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-09 12:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-12  2:46 ` Neil Brown
2003-09-12  6:54   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-12  7:11     ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-12  7:53     ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-15 22:01     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-16  8:21       ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-09-16 12:05         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-16 13:11         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-16 13:36           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-16 13:55             ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-09-16 14:13               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-16 14:33             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-16 14:36               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-16 14:36             ` Alan Cox
2003-09-16 15:20               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-16 15:29                 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-16 15:49                   ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-16 16:17                     ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-16 19:58                   ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-17 15:10                     ` Alan Cox
2003-09-17 19:19                       ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-17 19:30                         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-17 22:18                           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-18  7:08                           ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-18  7:12                             ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-18 11:22                               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-18 15:05                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-16 17:10               ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-16 19:53                 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-16 20:04                   ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-16 21:16                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-16 21:23                     ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-17 11:14                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-17 13:08                         ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-18  9:58                           ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-18 10:13                             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-18 11:22                               ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-17  6:41               ` Rogier Wolff
2003-09-17 10:26                 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-17 10:42                   ` Rogier Wolff
2003-09-17 10:53                     ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-17 19:19                   ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-18 11:39                     ` Rogier Wolff
2003-09-18 12:13                       ` Rogier Wolff
2003-09-16 15:22             ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-16 15:29             ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030916102113.0f00d7e9.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox