From: jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes)
To: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up MAX_NR_NODES/NUMNODES/etc. [5/5]
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:47:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030916164757.GA17359@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F665B5B.3000409@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:37:47PM -0700, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> Matthew Dobson wrote:
> >Ok, I made an attempt to clean up this mess quite a while ago (2.5.47),
> >but that patch is utterly useless now. At Martin's urging I've created
> >a new series of patches to resolve this.
> >
> >01 - Make sure MAX_NUMNODES is defined in one and only one place. Remove
> >superfluous definitions. Instead of defining MAX_NUMNODES in
> >asm/numnodes.h, we define NODES_SHIFT there. Then in linux/mmzone.h we
> >turn that NODES_SHIFT value into MAX_NUMNODES.
> >
> >02 - Remove MAX_NR_NODES. This value is only used in a couple of
> >places, and it's incorrectly used in all those places as far as I can
> >tell. Replace with MAX_NUMNODES. Create MAX_NODES_SHIFT and use this
> >value to check NODES_SHIFT is appropriate. A possible future patch
> >should make MAX_NODES_SHIFT vary based on 32 vs. 64 bit archs.
> >
> >03 - Fix up the sh arch. sh defined NR_NODES, change sh to use standard
> >MAX_NUMNODES instead.
> >
> >04 - Fix up the arm arch. This needs to be reviewed. Relatively
> >straightforward replacement of NR_NODES with standard MAX_NUMNODES.
> >
> >05 - Fix up the ia64 arch. This *definitely* needs to be reviewed. This
> >code made my head hurt. I think I may have gotten it right. Totally
> >untested.
Can you send me a patch that contains everything (or just the generic
code plus the ia64 stuff)? The stuff you posted looks good, and I'd
like to test ia64, but I have to merge your patch into the latest
discontig stuff I've been working on to do so.
Thanks,
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-16 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-10 21:36 [PATCH] you have how many nodes?? Jesse Barnes
2003-09-10 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-10 22:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-10 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-10 23:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-09-11 0:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-16 0:31 ` Matthew Dobson
2003-09-16 0:34 ` [PATCH] Clean up MAX_NR_NODES/NUMNODES/etc. [1/5] Matthew Dobson
2003-09-16 12:43 ` Matthew Dobson
2003-09-16 0:35 ` [PATCH[ Clean up MAX_NR_NODES/NUMNODES/etc. [2/5] Matthew Dobson
2003-09-16 0:36 ` [PATCH] Clean up MAX_NR_NODES/NUMNODES/etc. [3/5] Matthew Dobson
2003-09-16 0:37 ` [PATCH] Clean up MAX_NR_NODES/NUMNODES/etc. [4/5] Matthew Dobson
2003-09-16 0:37 ` [PATCH] Clean up MAX_NR_NODES/NUMNODES/etc. [5/5] Matthew Dobson
2003-09-16 16:47 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2003-09-19 22:01 ` [PATCH] you have how many nodes?? Matthew Dobson
2003-10-21 17:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-11 0:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030916164757.GA17359@sgi.com \
--to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox