public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger?
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 05:31:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030920033153.GA1452@velociraptor.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030919205220.GA19830@work.bitmover.com>

Hi Larry,

On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:52:20PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> won't come back until you have stopped being rude.  You do understand

If I would remotely think my signature is rude with you, or anybody
else, I wouldn't post it anymore, especially after you point me to it.

Some people in the past and probably even today thought they would
never depend on open source for critical things, a number of people
like me thinks just the opposite.

I don't see why you find this fact as rude. Do you think it's rude that
some people refuses to depend on closed software for critical tasks?
So then why do you think the source code of some closed software is
being offered to governaments for the first time after 20 years? Is it
rude that some governament prefers to have the source too and they as
well apparently see a value in not depending on closed software? I mean
you really can't just complain at me saying I'm rude, like if I was the
only one on earth sharing this view.

And clearly if somebody is interested in my links is because he's
sharing my view, otherwise he could just use bitkeeper that despite
being born after cvs, is much more feature rich (that's the reason of
the comment!).

I will never say that you're rude because your claims against open
source you posted several times in linux-kernel (you know the parasite that
eat the host, and lots and lots of stuff like that, all things that I
absolutely and totally disagree with), I will never say the bitkeeper
"free" licence is rude or whatever like that despite I find it much less
acceptable than all other proprietary licence I dealt with in my limited
experience with proprietary software, but people is different, it's not
about being rude, it's about thinking differently, and I will never buy
from you that thinking different is the same as being rude.

Andrea - If you refuse to depend on closed software for a critical
	 part of your business, these links may be useful:
	  rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
	  http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
	  svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.[46]/trunk

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-20  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-19 17:16 Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger? Roland Bless
2003-09-19 17:30 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-09-19 19:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-19 19:35   ` Russell King
2003-09-19 20:01     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-19 20:52       ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-19 21:05         ` Formal complaint , " Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-09-20  6:36           ` David S. Miller
2003-09-20  3:31         ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2003-09-20  4:30           ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-20 12:22             ` Bernd Schmidt
2003-09-20 13:52               ` Willy Tarreau
2003-09-20 13:54               ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-20 19:56                 ` Gateways (was Re: Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger?) Jamie Lokier
2003-09-20 20:14                   ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-21 11:52                     ` David S. Miller
2003-09-20 16:07               ` Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger? Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-20 14:23             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-20 15:13               ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-20 17:14                 ` Flames (was: Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger?) Stephen Satchell
2003-09-20 17:46                   ` Alan Cox
2003-09-21 10:40                 ` Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger? Eric W. Biederman
2003-09-21 14:22                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-21 14:52                     ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-21 15:53                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-23 12:46                     ` Bas Mevissen
2003-09-20 11:09   ` Roland Bless
2003-09-20 14:34     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-22 10:11       ` Roland Bless
2003-09-22 13:02         ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030920033153.GA1452@velociraptor.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox