public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger?
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:23:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030920142314.GA1338@velociraptor.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030920043026.GA10836@work.bitmover.com>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:30:26PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> The problem is that you are saying that closed source is bad, in
> particular, that BitKeeper is bad.  That's not the problem, lots of

this is not true. I never said that and I will never say that.

Find a quote where I said closed source is bad, I think I never said
that in my whole life, or if I said that it had to be a joke or
something like that. I may have said sometime that binary only drivers
are bad but that's just because of the pain they give after you
recompile a kernel, and I change the kernel very often ;).  I refuse to
use closed software myself for my critical tasks true, but I've never
said closed software is bad.

Closed software it's just not acceptable for my needs, but it can be
perfect for others.  It's not about good or bad right/wrong here. It's
about different people having different needs. And please avoid
imagination and stick to facts and to what I write, not to what you
think I want to say, because you're wrong about that.

As for the economy comments, I would suggest to have a look here:

	http://insider.thomsonfn.com/tfn/stocks.asp?imodule=coTearsheet&ticker=msft&ttype=A

As for the replacement of my signature you should stop insulting me
with "I was deliberately rude to the people providing them" or about
speculation that I'm saying that closed software is bad or whatever,
this is the last email I answer you if you keep making deliberate
wrong assumptions about something I never said and I will never say
because I simply wouldn't agree with that claims myself.

I'm very satisfied with the service you're providing, I thank you a lot
of that and for giving us the data in the open, we could lose nearly all
the 2.5 development logs if it wasn't for your effort. So I very much
hope that you will be able to provide it in the long run and that you
will be very successful, but the day you won't be able to provide it
anymore for whatever reason, I'm optimistic the open community will be
able to find a (possibly inferior) substitute.

Andrea - If you refuse to depend on closed software for a critical
	 part of your business, these links may be useful:
	  rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
	  http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
	  svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.[46]/trunk

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-20 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-19 17:16 Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger? Roland Bless
2003-09-19 17:30 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-09-19 19:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-19 19:35   ` Russell King
2003-09-19 20:01     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-19 20:52       ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-19 21:05         ` Formal complaint , " Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-09-20  6:36           ` David S. Miller
2003-09-20  3:31         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-20  4:30           ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-20 12:22             ` Bernd Schmidt
2003-09-20 13:52               ` Willy Tarreau
2003-09-20 13:54               ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-20 19:56                 ` Gateways (was Re: Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger?) Jamie Lokier
2003-09-20 20:14                   ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-21 11:52                     ` David S. Miller
2003-09-20 16:07               ` Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger? Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-20 14:23             ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2003-09-20 15:13               ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-20 17:14                 ` Flames (was: Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger?) Stephen Satchell
2003-09-20 17:46                   ` Alan Cox
2003-09-21 10:40                 ` Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger? Eric W. Biederman
2003-09-21 14:22                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-21 14:52                     ` Larry McVoy
2003-09-21 15:53                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-23 12:46                     ` Bas Mevissen
2003-09-20 11:09   ` Roland Bless
2003-09-20 14:34     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-22 10:11       ` Roland Bless
2003-09-22 13:02         ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030920142314.GA1338@velociraptor.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=lm@work.bitmover.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox