Re: 2.6.0-test5-mm4: wanxl doesn't compile with gcc 2.95

Krzysztof Halasa
2003-09-23T13:37:08Z

Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:

> > + " at 0x%LX!\n", card_name(pdev), (u64)addr);
>
> This should be "unsigned long long", not u64. That is what "%L" means,
> after all.

Right. I was under an impression they're the same.

I assume you don't want (me to post) a corrected patch, do you?

Thanks.
--
Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH