Re: log-buf-len dynamic

[Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:29:48PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:04:09AM +0200, andrea@kernel.org wrote:
> > > What we expected in return was the same understanding.
> > 
> > that is not accurate, you also asked us to giveup the freedom of
> > development in your area. 
> 
> If you were actually doing some significant development then maybe I'd
> respect you.  But you aren't.  So I don't.  You don't have the slightest
> understanding in this area, you've proved that beyond all reasonable
> doubt.  So you are just complaining about something you don't understand.
> 
> I truly hope you follow in the footsteps of others who got pissed at the
> BK licensing and try to implement a replacement.  BK makes VM systems
> seem like child's play.  Centralized systems like CVS are child's play.

If you weren't using the linux VM I'd respect you, but you are, and
still I respected you so far, probably I was wrong.

Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links:
	    rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
	    http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
	    svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.[46]/trunk