From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG/MEMLEAK?] struct pci_bus, child busses & bridges
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:54:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030925095426.B30419@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F7237FB.8050509@us.ibm.com>; from colpatch@us.ibm.com on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:34:03PM -0700
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:34:03PM -0700, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> In pci_alloc_child_bus (drivers/pci/probe.c), the child bus is allocated
> and it's struct dev * is set to point to the struct dev belonging to the
> bridge that this bus is 'on', or 'behind'. pci_alloc_child_bus is
> called in 3 places: pci_add_new_bus and twice in pci_scan_bridge. The
> calls in pci_scan_bridge allocate a new struct pci_bus, but then seem to
> throw the references away, *without* freeing them.
That is correct - they persist after they have been allocated until the
bridge device is destroyed (if ever) - it's lifetime is directly equivalent
to the lifetime of the bridge.
If you look carefully at pci_alloc_child_bus(), you will notice that
bridge->subordinate is setup to point at the pci_bus, which provides
a method to access the data held in the pci_bus later (eg, while we're
freeing the structures.)
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-25 0:34 [BUG/MEMLEAK?] struct pci_bus, child busses & bridges Matthew Dobson
2003-09-25 8:54 ` Russell King [this message]
2003-09-25 18:14 ` Matthew Dobson
2003-09-25 18:53 ` Patrick Mochel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030925095426.B30419@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox