From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
mru@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] SIS IDE DMA errors
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 08:13:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030927061342.GA14652@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309270319.37985.mhf@linuxmail.org>
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:19:37AM +0800, Michael Frank wrote:
> > > 00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev d0) (prog-if 80 [Master])
> > > Subsystem: Asustek Computer, Inc.: Unknown device 1688
> > > Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> > > Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> > > Latency: 128
> > > Region 4: I/O ports at b800 [size=16]
> > > 00: 39 10 13 55 07 00 00 00 d0 80 01 01 00 80 80 00
> > > 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > 20: 01 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 88 16
> > > 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > 40: 31 81 00 00 31 85 00 00 08 01 e6 51 00 02 00 02
> >
> > Ok, this means:
> >
> > 31 - hda: 90ns data active time, 30 ns data recovery time (PIO4)
> > 41 - hda: UDMA enabled, UDMA mode 5 (UDMA100)
> > 00 - hdb: 240ns/360ns (PIO0) - no drive present
> > 00 - hdb: UDMA disabled
> > 31 - hdc: 90ns/30ns PIO4
> > 85 - hdc: UDMA enabled, UDMA mode 2 (UDMA33)
> > 00 - hdd: 240ns/360ns (PIO0) - no drive present
> > 00 - hdd: UDMA disabled
>
> Was running 2.4.22.
>
> Now running 2.6.0-test5. Fresh boot.
>
> 00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
> Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RT8139
> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> Latency: 32 (8000ns min, 16000ns max)
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Region 0: I/O ports at e000 [size=256]
> Region 1: Memory at eb102000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
> Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=64K]
> Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0-,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> 00: ec 10 39 81 07 00 90 02 10 00 00 02 00 20 00 00
> 10: 01 e0 00 00 00 20 10 eb 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ec 10 39 81
> 30: 00 00 00 00 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 20 40
> 40: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>
> I am surprised at your analysis of the pci bus data. By what you
> stated my drive(r) should be doing PIO ;)
1) You're looking at your ethernet controller config registers,
not at the IDE controller config registers.
2) The 961 and 963 have completely different config register layout.
Actually, there is not much common between the 961 and the 963,
except for the '5513' fake ID. (The 961's real id is 5517, and the
963's is 5518).
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-27 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-26 12:30 [BUG?] SIS IDE DMA errors Måns Rullgård
2003-09-26 14:08 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-26 14:07 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-26 15:32 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-26 15:38 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-26 19:44 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-29 9:23 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-29 13:12 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-26 16:59 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 17:27 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-26 17:53 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 17:46 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-26 18:33 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 19:19 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-27 6:13 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2003-09-27 6:40 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-29 9:22 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-29 10:01 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-10-02 0:32 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-26 18:29 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-29 11:18 ` Lionel Bouton
2003-09-26 18:15 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-26 18:22 ` Michael Frank
2003-10-03 8:38 ` [BUG?] lost interrupt (was: SIS IDE DMA errors) David Caldwell
2003-10-03 9:08 ` [BUG?] lost interrupt Måns Rullgård
2003-10-03 20:07 ` David Caldwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030927061342.GA14652@ucw.cz \
--to=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhf@linuxmail.org \
--cc=mru@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox