Re: [Test] exec-shield-2.6.0-test5-G2 vs. paxtest & libsafe

Breno
2003-09-27T18:13:21Z

something like this:
www.bandnet.com.br/~breno_silva/Kernel_linux/sec_stack.c
www.bandnet.com.br/~breno_silva/Kernel_linux/sec_stack1.1v.c

att,
Breno
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Gabor MICSKO" <gmicsko@szintezis.hu>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Test] exec-shield-2.6.0-test5-G2 vs. paxtest & libsafe

>
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Gabor MICSKO wrote:
>
> > Kernel:
> > Linux sunshine 2.6.0-test5-exec-shield-nptl #3 SMP 2003. sze. 27.,
> > szombat, 13.37.42 CEST i686 GNU/Linux
>
> thanks for the testing. The ELF loader changes had a bug which ended up in
> creating an extra executable page after .bss, failing some of the tests.
> I've fixed this, could you try the -G3 patch?:
>
> redhat.com/~mingo/exec-shield/exec-shield-2.6.0-test5-G3
> redhat.com/~mingo/exec-shield/exec-shield-2.6.0-test5-bk12-G3
>
> Ingo
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/