From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Athlon Prefetch workaround for 2.6.0test6
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:27:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030930132729.GB23333@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bla6lf$3ul$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:02:39PM +0000, bill davidsen wrote:
> In article <20030929125629.GA1746@averell>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:
>
> | It removes the previous dumb in kernel workaround for this and shrinks the
> | kernel by >10k.
> |
> | Small behaviour change is that a SIGBUS fault for a *_user access will
> | cause an EFAULT now, no SIGBUS.
> |
> | This version addresses all criticism that I got for previous versions.
> |
> | - Only checks on AMD K7+ CPUs.
> | - Computes linear address for VM86 mode or code segments
> | with non zero base.
> | - Some cleanup
> | - No pointer comparisons
> | - More comments
>
> I have to try this on a P4 and K7, but WRT "Only checks on AMD K7+ CPUs"
> I hope you meant "only generates code if AMD CPU is target" and not that
> the code size penalty is still there for CPUs which don't need it.
NO NO NO NO NO.
This *has* to be there on a P4 kernel too, as we can now boot those on a K7 too.
The 'code size penalty' you talk about is in the region of a few hundred
bytes. Much less than a page. There are far more obvious bloat candidates.
Dave
--
Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-29 12:56 [PATCH] Athlon Prefetch workaround for 2.6.0test6 Andi Kleen
2003-09-29 17:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-29 17:49 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-29 20:08 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30 5:50 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-30 9:35 ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-09-29 22:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30 5:38 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-30 0:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-29 21:02 ` bill davidsen
2003-09-30 0:50 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-30 13:27 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-09-30 15:36 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] <20030929125629.GA1746@averell.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030929170323.GC21798@mail.jlokier.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030929174910.GA90905@colin2.muc.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030929200820.GA23444@mail.jlokier.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930093556.GB12970@iram.es.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-30 9:50 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030930132729.GB23333@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox