From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
richard.brunner@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mutilated form of Andi Kleen's AMD prefetch errata patch
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:55:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030930235528.GA32209@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030930172618.GE5507@redhat.com>
Dave Jones wrote:
> Which gets us back to the question of why this is needed at all ?
> You said earlier "In case you hadn't fully grokked it, my code doesn't
> disable the workaround!" So why do you need this ?
To change the prefetch workaround from a critical requirement to an
optimisation knob.
X86_USE_3DNOW is very similar: if it's enabled, the kernel has some
extra code to make certain CPUs run faster, but they also run fine
without it. X86_OOSTORE is another.
What I'd really like your opinion on is the appropriate userspace
behaviour. If we don't care about fixing up userspace, then
__ex_table is a much tidier workaround for the prefetch bug. If we do
care about fixing up userspace, then do we need a policy decision that
says it's not acceptable to run on AMD without userspace fixups from
2.6.0 onwards - it must fixup userspace or refuse to run?
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-30 7:38 [PATCH] Mutilated form of Andi Kleen's AMD prefetch errata patch Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30 8:01 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-30 13:22 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-30 13:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30 13:53 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-30 14:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30 15:08 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-30 16:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30 17:26 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-30 23:55 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2003-10-01 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] <20030930073814.GA26649@mail.jlokier.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930132211.GA23333@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930133936.GA28876@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930135324.GC5507@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930144526.GC28876@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930150825.GD5507@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930165450.GF28876@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930172618.GE5507@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-30 19:08 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-30 20:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-01 1:54 Nakajima, Jun
2003-10-01 2:07 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 2:08 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-10-01 2:23 Nakajima, Jun
2003-10-01 2:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-01 3:14 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 4:30 Nakajima, Jun
2003-10-01 5:38 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-01 5:48 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 6:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-01 6:32 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 6:57 ` Jamie Lokier
[not found] <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304AFCF@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20031001053833.GB1131@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930224853.15073447.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20031001061348.GE1131@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030930233258.37ed9f7f.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-10-01 6:47 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 7:00 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 7:06 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 7:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-01 7:41 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 8:02 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-10-01 8:49 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 9:33 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-01 14:51 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 15:19 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 15:24 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 16:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-01 7:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-01 7:39 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 8:20 ` Jamie Lokier
[not found] ` <20031001065705.GI1131@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-10-01 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 7:24 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-01 7:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-01 8:00 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030930235528.GA32209@mail.shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.brunner@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox